The Luggers versus the Butchers Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

The Luggers versus the Butchers - Case Study Exampledy clearly perform entirely different types of tasks but this does not mean that they should also be case-hardened in a contrasting or a conflicting manner by those armed with managerial responsibilities. The managers at FMC tended to behave very strictly with the butchers but had close affiliation with the luggers on the other hand. The butchers were overworked and the luggers were not in anyones control. Such negative workplace attitudes reflect issues of inequity and injustice and research stresses that organizational peace, communication and justice perception are very important factors in order to be prospered (Ince & Gul, 2011, p. 106). When employees are not treated equally and their concerns are not heard, they start losing their confidence and develop suffering-pitched self-esteems (Katcher & Snyder, 2007, p. ix Ganster & Schaubroeck, 1991). That is why the discontent butchers developed deep feelings of hatred and res entment for the management. Organizations can avoid having unhappy employees by successfully addressing their concerns (Katcher, 2006).Organizational commitment is a valuable tool to mention here for the managers as a way of addressing the issues at FMC. This refers to the relative strength of an individuals identication and involvement in a particular organization (Steers, cited in Paik, Parboteeah, & Shim, 2007, p. 1770 Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982, p. 27) and it is widely believed that the more organizational commitment an employee has, the less are the chances of him/her go away the organization. Organizational commitment is cognitive assessment that reflects characteristics of the work milieu (Gelade, Dobson, & Gilbert, 2006, p. 543) which implies that the butchers had low commitment because the work environment in itself was degrading, unfair, and discriminatory. An employees commitment to the organization also related to the factor of leadership behaviors (Mathieu & Zajac , 1990, p. 171) which were especially low